- Which Credential This Passing Score Applies To
- The Three Parts and Their Thresholds
- Part 1: What 75% Means on a 100-Question Closed-Book Exam
- Parts 2 and 3: Why 85% Changes Your Preparation
- Where Points Come From: The 22 Task Headings
- Fees, Retests and What a Miss Costs
- The Renewal Exam Standard
- A Domain-Sequenced Plan Built Around the Thresholds
- Verifying the Current Standard Before You Apply
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Part 1 is a proctored, closed-book, 100-question multiple-choice exam with 3 hours and a 75% passing standard.
- Parts 2 and 3 are unproctored practical parts, and each requires 85% to pass.
- Parts 2 and 3 share one 30-day completion window that opens after you pass Part 1.
- Initial certification, recertification and retest fees are each $300 for IAI members or $400 for nonmembers.
Which Credential This Passing Score Applies To
Before any numbers, a point of identity. The standards in this article belong to the Forensic Video Certification administered by the International Association for Identification (IAI) through its Forensic Video Examiner Certification Board. The IAI's current operations manual names the credential Certified Forensic Video Examiner (CFVE), and its official examiner roster uses that language. "CFVT" is the label this site and domain use for the program, but it is not established as the IAI's official abbreviation, so you should not advertise it that way on a resume or in testimony.
That distinction matters for scoring because several other forensic video credentials exist with similar names and different rules. The Law Enforcement & Emergency Services Video Association (LEVA) runs separate Certified Forensic Video Technician and Certified Forensic Video Analyst programs, with their own exams and criteria at leva.org/certification. Nothing below applies to those. If you are weighing which path fits your career, our overview of what CFVT certification is and the notes on what CFVT stands for sort out the naming overlap.
The Three Parts and Their Thresholds
Many candidates search for "the passing score" expecting a single number. This program does not have one. It has three separate gates, each with its own format and standard, and you must clear them in order. Passing Part 1 is what releases the two practical parts to you.
| Part | Format | Standard | Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 | 100 multiple-choice questions | 75% | Proctored by a Board-approved proctor, closed book, 3 hours |
| Part 2 | 22 questions about supplied video files | 85% | Unproctored; resources allowed; sole original work |
| Part 3 | Examination, comparison and/or evaluation of four supplied video files, with processed media and/or expert reports submitted | 85% | Unproctored; resources allowed; sole original work |
Two details deserve attention. First, the 22 questions in Part 2 are not added to the 100-question written count; the "Exam" description covers Part 1 only. Second, Parts 2 and 3 share a single 30-day completion window, so you are not given 30 days for each. Plan them together. For the broader eligibility chain that precedes all of this, see CFVT requirements and how to qualify.
Part 1: What 75% Means on a 100-Question Closed-Book Exam
With 100 multiple-choice questions and a 75% standard, the arithmetic is simple: you need 75 correct answers. You have 3 hours, which works out to roughly 108 seconds per question if you used the full time evenly. That is generous for recall questions and tight only if you let a handful of calculation or scenario items consume your clock.
What closed-book changes
Because the written exam is closed-book and proctored by a Board-approved proctor, you cannot look up compression parameters, format specifications or terminology. The manual's prescribed reading list is therefore your memory work, not your reference shelf. That list includes How Video Works (second edition, entire text), the proposed frameworks for digital video authentication and forensic image enhancement (the latter chapters 1 through 4), MPEG-4 Video Authentication Using File Structure and Metadata (chapters 1 and 4 through 6), and the designated SWGDE references on acquisition, processing, formats and compression, comparison, FFmpeg, photogrammetry, content and time-based analysis, the glossary and error mitigation.
Use the prescribed editions. Do not swap in newer technical publications on the assumption they are interchangeable; the exam is built from the manual's named references.
Where the written exam rewards precision
Questions in this field tend to reward exact terminology and defensible reasoning rather than general familiarity.
- Distinguishing container, codec and stream-level concepts when analyzing file structure and metadata
- Recognizing compression artifacts and what they imply about a file's processing history
- Knowing the order of operations in acquisition, verification and handling so evidence integrity is preserved
- Applying the language of uncertainty and error mitigation rather than overstating conclusions
Our difficulty breakdown discusses why candidates with strong hands-on experience still find the closed-book part demanding: daily work relies on tools and lookups, while this format asks you to carry the concepts in your head.
Parts 2 and 3: Why 85% Changes Your Preparation
The practical parts raise the bar from 75% to 85%, and they remove the proctor. Resources may be used, which sounds like relief, but all responses must be your sole original work. The higher standard reflects what these parts test: not whether you remember a fact, but whether you can examine real supplied video files and produce correct, well-supported findings.
Part 2: 22 questions on supplied files
Twenty-two questions at 85% leaves very little room. Treat the supplied files as casework: verify integrity first, characterize the format and metadata, then answer. Rushing to the questions before you have properly examined the media is the most common way to give away answers you actually knew how to get.
Part 3: four files, with deliverables
Part 3 asks you to examine, compare and/or evaluate four supplied video files and to submit processed media and/or expert reports. Here the passing standard is judged on both the technical result and the way you document it. This is where Domain 17 (documentation and authorship of reports) and Domain 20 (mitigation of sources of error, uncertainty and bias) stop being abstract headings.
Where Points Come From: The 22 Task Headings
The program lists 22 task headings under its scope. These are unweighted certification-task headings for preparation, not a published weighted blueprint. That means no one can honestly tell you which heading carries the most points, and you should be skeptical of anyone who does. What you can do is map the headings to the three parts and prepare for all of them. The full walkthrough is in our guide to all 22 content areas.
| Task heading | Most likely to surface in |
|---|---|
| Acquisition of video files from various recording devices | Part 1 and the early steps of any practical |
| File verification and integrity | All three parts; foundational to every practical file |
| Evidence handling and packaging | Part 1 |
| Playback of various video file formats, including proprietary formats | Part 1 and Part 2 |
| Video file format conversion | Part 2 and Part 3 |
| Video processing techniques; image processing techniques | Part 1 and Part 3 |
| Video editing | Part 1 |
| Video enhancement/clarification; image enhancement/clarification | Part 1 and Part 3 deliverables |
| Identification of damaged media; video file repair/reconstruction | Part 2 and Part 3 |
| Photogrammetry | Part 1 and potentially a practical file |
| Comparative analysis | Part 3 |
| Content authentication; source authentication | Part 1 and Part 3 |
| Documentation/authorship of reports | Part 3 and Part 1 |
| Expert testimony in legal proceedings | Part 1 |
| Identification of video/image attributes and compression artifacts | Part 1 and Part 2 |
| Mitigation of sources of error, uncertainty, and bias | Across all parts |
| Operation of current and legacy equipment/methods | Part 1 and Part 2 |
| File format and metadata analysis | Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 |
Treat the right-hand column as a study aid, not a published rule. The headings do not establish exhaustive exam coverage, so a question can fall just outside a heading's wording and still be fair game within the field.
Three headings that quietly decide the 85% parts
If you are short on time, these underpin the largest share of practical work.
- File verification and integrity: an unverified starting file undermines every downstream finding.
- File format and metadata analysis: practical questions often hinge on what the structure of the file reveals.
- Mitigation of error, uncertainty and bias: graders reward calibrated conclusions, not overconfident ones.
Fees, Retests and What a Miss Costs
Applications run through eCert, and the fee structure is the same across the main transaction types: initial certification, recertification and retest applications are each $300 for IAI members or $400 for nonmembers. Division-only membership does not qualify for member pricing, which catches some applicants who assume any affiliation counts. Fee details are published at the IAI fee page.
The practical consequence for passing-score thinking: a retest is a full new application at the same price tier, not a discount. That makes it worth treating your first attempt as the one you intend to pass, rather than a diagnostic. If you want the complete picture beyond the application fee, including training hours and materials, see the pricing breakdown.
The Renewal Exam Standard
Passing is not a one-time event. Certification is valid for up to 5 years, and renewal requires 80 professional-development credits earned within the preceding 5 years, an application and fee, and an unproctored 10-question multiple-choice examination. You must complete it within 14 days, and 80% is required to pass, meaning at least 8 of 10 correct.
This renewal exam is mandatory for applications submitted on or after January 1, 2026. Applications may be filed no earlier than 12 months before expiration. Because the exam is unproctored and short, the real risk is not difficulty but timing: miss the filing window and the 14-day completion clock, and you create avoidable problems for a credential you spent years earning.
A Domain-Sequenced Plan Built Around the Thresholds
Because the three parts demand different skills, one generic study routine will not serve you. Sequence by what each threshold punishes. This is deliberately tied to the headings above; for a fuller reading and resource plan, see the complete study guide.
Foundations for Part 1 (75%)
- Read How Video Works in full; this underpins acquisition, formats and artifacts
- Drill file verification, integrity and evidence handling until the order of operations is automatic
- Memorize format, container and codec vocabulary, since you cannot look it up in the room
Analysis and authentication
- Work through the MPEG-4 file-structure and metadata chapters and the authentication framework
- Cover content authentication, source authentication and comparative analysis
- Study photogrammetry and the SWGDE material on error mitigation
Practical readiness for the 85% parts
- Practice documenting findings and writing a defensible report, not just reaching an answer
- Rehearse repair, conversion and enhancement workflows on your own test media
- Decide in advance how you will split the shared 30-day window between Parts 2 and 3
Candidates who want to pressure-test recall before the proctored session can use the practice questions on the main site for the knowledge-heavy headings, then move to hands-on file work for the practical parts. A condensed refresher lives in the one-page review.
Verifying the Current Standard Before You Apply
Because this credential's rules are revised periodically, the single most useful habit is checking the document identifier and revision date rather than trusting a convenient alias. The requirements here follow the Forensic Certification Management Board Certification Program Operations Manual, FCMB-01-2020-C27, revised October 1, 2026, specifically sections 7, 8.6 and 8.9, available from the master manual link and the prerequisites page.
If you are still deciding whether the effort is justified, the career-side questions are covered in our ROI analysis, and the practical employment picture is in the jobs overview. Candidates comparing credentials on a pass-rate basis should note that we do not cite a published pass rate here, because none is reflected in the program facts; our page on the pass rate question explains what can and cannot be said.
Frequently Asked Questions
Part 1 is a proctored, closed-book exam of 100 multiple-choice questions with 3 hours allowed, and the passing standard is 75%. That means 75 correct answers. It must be passed before you receive the two practical parts.
Parts 2 and 3 are unproctored and allow resources, but they test applied work on supplied video files, so the standard is set higher at 85%. Part 2 has 22 questions on supplied files; Part 3 requires examination, comparison and/or evaluation of four files with processed media and/or expert reports submitted.
Parts 2 and 3 share a single 30-day completion window rather than 30 days each. Resources may be used, but every response must be your sole original work, so plan your time across both parts from the first day.
Retest applications are $300 for IAI members or $400 for nonmembers, the same as initial certification and recertification. Division-only membership does not qualify for member pricing.
Renewal uses an unproctored 10-question multiple-choice exam completed within 14 days, with 80% required, so at least 8 correct. It is mandatory for applications submitted on or after January 1, 2026, alongside 80 professional-development credits earned in the preceding 5 years.
No. The 22 task headings are unweighted preparation headings, not a published weighted blueprint, and they do not establish a highest-weighted area. Prepare across all of them, giving extra time to file verification, metadata analysis and error mitigation, which support the practical parts.